Summary unavailable.

Questions

Question 1

In which geographic location and decade were Drug Courts first developed?

View answer and explanation
Question 2

What is the defining characteristic of the courtroom process within Drug Courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 3

Which group of professionals is identified as working together in a drug court setting?

View answer and explanation
Question 4

Approximately how many drug, treatment, or specialty courts are currently operating in the United States according to the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 5

Which of the following is NOT listed as a type of specialty court included in the count of nearly 3,500 courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 6

How do the overall results of Drug Courts compare to those of boot camps?

View answer and explanation
Question 7

What is the primary reason cited for the mixed results of Drug Court assessments?

View answer and explanation
Question 8

When are Drug Courts considered an effective community alternative, according to the text?

View answer and explanation
Question 9

Which of the following is mentioned as a metric for assessing recidivism in Drug Court participants?

View answer and explanation
Question 10

What did the report by Fluellen and Trone (2000) demonstrate about the recidivism rates of drug court graduates?

View answer and explanation
Question 11

According to the Fluellen and Trone (2000) study cited, what was the recidivism rate for the comparison group not enrolled in a drug court program?

View answer and explanation
Question 12

What is the overall conclusion about Drug Courts in comparison to control-oriented ISPs and boot camps?

View answer and explanation
Question 13

The in-depth review of the overall rating of Drug Courts mentioned in the text includes analysis of how many studies?

View answer and explanation
Question 14

What is the general finding regarding the risk of rearrest for a drug-crime for individuals who have been through drug courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 15

Which of the following is listed as a specific type of specialty court that has emerged from the drug court model?

View answer and explanation
Question 16

The proliferation of Drug Courts in the United States is described as having been:

View answer and explanation
Question 17

Which resource is mentioned as providing a detailed account and map of Drug Courts via its database?

View answer and explanation
Question 18

The success of Drug Courts is described as being mixed, largely dependent on what factor?

View answer and explanation
Question 19

The text indicates that Drug Courts have flourished and are now present in how many states?

View answer and explanation
Question 20

What does the term 'persistence models' refer to when assessing recidivism?

View answer and explanation
Question 21

In the study by Fluellen and Trone (2000), the recidivism rate for drug court graduates was 10 percent, compared to what rate for the non-participant group?

View answer and explanation
Question 22

How is the team dynamic in a drug court described?

View answer and explanation
Question 23

Drug Courts are categorized as a form of what larger type of sanction?

View answer and explanation
Question 24

When assessing recidivism, what is one of the specific types of charges the text mentions as a potential metric?

View answer and explanation
Question 25

The overall rating of Drug Courts on CrimeSolutions.gov is based on a review of studies from where?

View answer and explanation
Question 26

What is the general sentiment expressed in the text about the need for further research on Drug Courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 27

Which type of specialty court is mentioned alongside Veterans, Mental Health, DUI, and Juvenile Drug Courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 28

The results on Drug Courts are described as being more favorable than which other intermediate sanction?

View answer and explanation
Question 29

According to the text, what is the 'unique' aspect of Drug Courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 30

Who were the authors of the 2000 report from the Vera Institute that demonstrated Drug Court graduates were half as likely to recidivate?

View answer and explanation
Question 31

When evaluated solely on the basis of cost savings compared to incarceration, how are Drug Courts viewed?

View answer and explanation
Question 32

The text states that in a drug court, judges, prosecutors, caseworkers, and program coordinators all do what?

View answer and explanation
Question 33

According to the text, the success of drug courts can be difficult to assess because the results are mixed, depending on what?

View answer and explanation
Question 34

Based on the text, which statement best summarizes the overall effectiveness of Drug Courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 35

What did the review mentioned on CrimeSolutions.gov, which covered over 30 studies, provide?

View answer and explanation
Question 36

In what U.S. state did Drug Courts originate?

View answer and explanation
Question 37

What is the primary difference in how drug court graduates' recidivism was measured in the Fluellen and Trone (2000) study versus other general measures?

View answer and explanation
Question 38

The text implies that the rapid flourishing of Drug Courts is similar to the growth of what?

View answer and explanation
Question 39

Which statement accurately describes the finding about rearrest risk for drug-crime among Drug Court participants?

View answer and explanation
Question 40

What does the text suggest about the finality of the current understanding of Drug Courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 41

The operation of Drug Courts involves a collaboration between all the following professionals EXCEPT:

View answer and explanation
Question 42

The success rate for Drug Court graduates in the Fluellen and Trone (2000) study showed a recidivism rate that was how many percentage points lower than the comparison group?

View answer and explanation
Question 43

Which of these is NOT mentioned as a metric for assessing recidivism when evaluating drug courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 44

The text contrasts the supportive, non-adversarial model of Drug Courts with which other type of sanction that is focused on control?

View answer and explanation
Question 45

What does the text say about the number of specialty courts like Veterans and Mental Health Courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 46

The text describes Drug Courts' rapid growth by saying they 'flourished' and are now in every state. This indicates they are seen as a _________ sanction.

View answer and explanation
Question 47

Based on the text, if a policymaker's primary goal is to reduce correctional costs, would they likely support Drug Courts?

View answer and explanation
Question 48

The collaborative team in a Drug Court includes a program coordinator, judge, caseworker, and which other professional?

View answer and explanation
Question 49

According to the study by Fluellen and Trone (2000), what was the recidivism rate for graduates of a drug court program?

View answer and explanation
Question 50

The chapter concludes its discussion of Drug Courts by comparing them to which two other 'ineffective' sanctions?

View answer and explanation

Other chapters

1.1. Crime and the Criminal Justice System1.2. Deviance, Rule Violations, and Criminality1.3. Social Norms: Folkways, Mores, Taboo, and Laws1.4. Interactionist View1.5. Consensus View and Decriminalizing Laws1.6. Conflict View1.7. The Three C's: Cops, Courts, and Corrections1.8. The Crime Control and Due Process Models1.9. How Cases Move Through the System1.10. Media Coverage of Crimes1.11. Wedding Cake Model of Justice1.12. Street Crime, Corporate Crime, and White-Collar Crime1.13. Different Types of Crimes and Offenses1.14. Victims and Victim Typologies1.15. Victim Rights and Assistance1.16. "Spare the Rod, Spoil the Child" Myth/Controversy2.1. Dark or Hidden Figure of Crime2.2. Official Statistics2.3. Victimization Studies2.4. Self-Report Statistics2.5. Misusing Statistics3.1. Functions and Limitations of Law3.2. Civil, Criminal, and Moral Wrongs3.3. Sources of Criminal Law: Federal and State Constitutions3.4. Sources of Criminal Law: Statutes, Ordinances, and Other Legislative Enactments3.5. Sources of Law: Administrative Law, Common Law, Case Law and Court Rules3.6. Classifications of Law3.7. Substantive Law: Defining Crimes, Inchoate Liability, Accomplice Liability, and Defenses3.8. Substantive Law: Punishment: Incarceration and Confinement Sanctions3.9. Substantive Law: Physical Punishment Sentences3.10. Substantive Law: Monetary Punishment Sentences3.11. Substantive Law: Community-Based Sentences3.12. Procedural Law4.1. Importance of Policy in Criminal Justice4.2. The Myth of Moral Panics4.3. The Stages of Policy Development4.4. Importance of Evidence Based Practices4.5. Re-Evaluating Policy5.1. What is Theory?5.2. What Makes a Good Theory?5.3. Pre-Classical Theory5.4. Classical School5.5. Neoclassical5.6. Positivist Criminology5.7. Biological and Psychological Positivism5.8. The Chicago School5.9. Strain Theories5.10. Learning Theories5.11. Control Theories5.12. Other Criminological Theories6.1. Policing in Ancient Times6.2. Sir Robert Peel6.3. Policing Eras6.4. Levels of Policing and Role of Police6.5. Recruitment and Hiring in Policing6.6. Recruitment and Hiring Websites for Future Careers6.7. Police Misconduct, Accountability, and Corruption6.8. Current Issues: Police Shootings6.9. Current Issues: Use of Force and Vehicle Pursuits6.10. Current Issues: Stereotypes in Policing6.11. Current Issues: Accountability6.12. Current Issues: Internal Affairs and Discipline6.13.Current Issues: Body Cameras6.14. Myth: “Police Only Write Speeding Tickets to Harass Citizens and it is Entrapment.”7.1. Introduction to the U.S. Court System7.2. Jurisdiction7.3. Structure of the Courts: The Dual Court and Federal Court System7.4. Structure of the Courts: State Courts7.5. American Trial Courts and the Principle of Orality7.6. The Appeals Process, Standard of Review, and Appellate Decisions7.7. Federal Appellate Review of State Cases7.8. Courtroom Players: Judges and Court Staff7.9. Courtroom Players: Prosecutors7.10. Courtroom Workgroup: Defense Attorneys8.1. A Brief History of The Philosophies of Punishment8.2. Retribution8.3. Deterrence8.4. Incapacitation8.5. Rehabilitation8.6. Prisons and Jails8.7. A Brief History of Prisons and Jails8.8. Types of Jails8.9. Who Goes to Jail?8.10. Growth of Prisons in the United States8.11. Types of Prisons8.12. Prison Levels8.13. Who Goes to Prison?9.1. Diversion9.2. Intermediate Sanctions9.3. Probation9.4. Boot Camps/Shock Incarceration9.6. Halfway Houses9.8. House Arrest9.9. Community Residential Facilities9.10. Restorative Justice9.11. Parole9.12. Current Issues in Corrections9.13. Current Issues in Corrections: Mass Incarceration9.14. Current Issues in Corrections: War on Drugs and Gangs9.15. Current Issues in Corrections: Aging and Overcrowding9.16. Current Issues in Corrections: Reentry and the Future of Corrections10.1. Youth Crime10.2. Juvenile Justice10.3. History of the Juvenile Justice System10.4. Delinquency10.5. Juvenile Justice Process10.6. Due Process in the Juvenile Court10.7. The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 197410.8. Getting Tough: Initiatives for Punishment and Accountability10.9. Returning to Rehabilitation in the Contemporary Juvenile Justice System10.10. The Structure of the Juvenile Justice System10.11. Juvenile InstitutionsGlossary