Summary unavailable.

Questions

Question 1

According to Comte's theory on the progression of knowledge, which stage used supernatural or otherworldly powers to explain behaviors?

View answer and explanation
Question 2

In the Middle Ages, what was the prevailing spiritual explanation for why a person would break the law or fail to conform to societal norms?

View answer and explanation
Question 3

During the pre-classical era, how was crime viewed in relation to religious doctrine?

View answer and explanation
Question 4

What was the basis for the government's moral authority to punish criminals during the pre-classical era?

View answer and explanation
Question 5

What was the 'trial by battle' as a method of determining innocence in the pre-classical era?

View answer and explanation
Question 6

In a 'trial by ordeal' during the Middle Ages, what was the expected outcome for an innocent person?

View answer and explanation
Question 7

How is the system of punishments and justice in the pre-classical era characterized in the text?

View answer and explanation
Question 8

In the pre-classical era, which factor was most influential in determining an individual's punishment?

View answer and explanation
Question 9

Who was Auguste Comte, as described in the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 10

What does the term 'epistemology', as used in the chapter's description of Comte's interests, refer to?

View answer and explanation
Question 11

Which of Comte's stages of knowledge progression is characterized by the use of rational and logical arguments?

View answer and explanation
Question 12

In the pre-classical view, what was the underlying assumption about the source of law?

View answer and explanation
Question 13

Who was responsible for determining guilt in the pre-classical justice system described in the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 14

What was the critical flaw in the pre-classical justice system regarding how punishment was assigned?

View answer and explanation
Question 15

The final stage in Comte's framework for the progression of knowledge, which relies on positivism and scientific inquiry, is known as what?

View answer and explanation
Question 16

What was the assumed outcome for the guilty party in a trial by ordeal?

View answer and explanation
Question 17

The pre-classical era's reliance on trials by battle and ordeal demonstrates a belief in what force to reveal the truth?

View answer and explanation
Question 18

Which of the following beliefs was central to the pre-classical understanding of crime and deviance?

View answer and explanation
Question 19

What was the relationship between the state and God in the context of pre-classical justice?

View answer and explanation
Question 20

The idea that 'only the victor is innocent' is the principle behind which pre-classical practice?

View answer and explanation
Question 21

Which of these concepts was NOT a factor in determining punishment during the pre-classical era?

View answer and explanation
Question 22

The pre-classical era described in the chapter aligns most closely with which of Comte's three stages of knowledge?

View answer and explanation
Question 23

What term did the chapter use to describe the legal framework that assumed laws were God-given?

View answer and explanation
Question 24

What does the text imply was the main problem with punishments being determined by a person's rank, status, and wealth?

View answer and explanation
Question 25

Which phrase best describes the pre-classical belief about the cause of human misconduct?

View answer and explanation
Question 26

The two methods mentioned for an accused to 'prove' their innocence, trial by battle and trial by ordeal, were both dependent on what?

View answer and explanation
Question 27

The text states that in the pre-classical era, 'crime was equivalent to sin.' What does this imply about the legal system?

View answer and explanation
Question 28

Who is credited in the text with outlining a three-stage progression of human knowledge: theological, metaphysical, and scientific?

View answer and explanation
Question 29

The pre-classical focus on demons and the devil as causes of crime is an example of which type of explanation from Comte's model?

View answer and explanation
Question 30

What was the fundamental problem with the process of determining guilt in the pre-classical era, as described in the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 31

Which of the following describes the metaphysical stage of knowledge, according to Comte?

View answer and explanation
Question 32

The text suggests that pre-classical justice was highly inequitable because punishment depended on social standing rather than what?

View answer and explanation
Question 33

A core assumption of the pre-classical era was that governments had the moral authority to punish because they were acting on behalf of whom?

View answer and explanation
Question 34

Being labeled a 'wizard or witch' was a pre-classical explanation for what type of behavior?

View answer and explanation
Question 35

What does the description 'arbitrary and severe' imply about pre-classical punishments?

View answer and explanation
Question 36

The entire system of pre-classical thought described in the chapter serves as a historical background to contrast with which later school of thought?

View answer and explanation
Question 37

In Comte's framework, what method of inquiry defines the scientific stage?

View answer and explanation
Question 38

The pre-classical idea that feudal lords determined guilt with 'God's permission' highlights what about the era's power structure?

View answer and explanation
Question 39

What is the primary difference between a trial by battle and a trial by ordeal?

View answer and explanation
Question 40

What did it mean for justice to be 'arbitrary' in the pre-classical era?

View answer and explanation
Question 41

The belief that a person broke the law because they were 'possessed by demons' is an example of what kind of thinking?

View answer and explanation
Question 42

Which factor determined punishment in the pre-classical era instead of the specific actions of the accused?

View answer and explanation
Question 43

What was Comte's field of interest, which the text defines as the study of 'how humans obtain valid knowledge'?

View answer and explanation
Question 44

According to the pre-classical view, what was the relationship between human actions and supernatural forces?

View answer and explanation
Question 45

The practice of trial by ordeal, where the innocent were expected to be unharmed, relied on what core belief?

View answer and explanation
Question 46

Which social figure held the authority to determine guilt and punishment in the pre-classical era?

View answer and explanation
Question 47

What does Comte's three-stage theory suggest about the development of human understanding?

View answer and explanation
Question 48

The lack of consideration for the 'merits of the case' in pre-classical justice meant that...

View answer and explanation
Question 49

Pre-classical theory assumed that the government's right to punish was not a social construct, but a...

View answer and explanation
Question 50

Which statement best summarizes the justice system of the pre-classical era?

View answer and explanation

Other chapters

1.1. Crime and the Criminal Justice System1.2. Deviance, Rule Violations, and Criminality1.3. Social Norms: Folkways, Mores, Taboo, and Laws1.4. Interactionist View1.5. Consensus View and Decriminalizing Laws1.6. Conflict View1.7. The Three C's: Cops, Courts, and Corrections1.8. The Crime Control and Due Process Models1.9. How Cases Move Through the System1.10. Media Coverage of Crimes1.11. Wedding Cake Model of Justice1.12. Street Crime, Corporate Crime, and White-Collar Crime1.13. Different Types of Crimes and Offenses1.14. Victims and Victim Typologies1.15. Victim Rights and Assistance1.16. "Spare the Rod, Spoil the Child" Myth/Controversy2.1. Dark or Hidden Figure of Crime2.2. Official Statistics2.3. Victimization Studies2.4. Self-Report Statistics2.5. Misusing Statistics3.1. Functions and Limitations of Law3.2. Civil, Criminal, and Moral Wrongs3.3. Sources of Criminal Law: Federal and State Constitutions3.4. Sources of Criminal Law: Statutes, Ordinances, and Other Legislative Enactments3.5. Sources of Law: Administrative Law, Common Law, Case Law and Court Rules3.6. Classifications of Law3.7. Substantive Law: Defining Crimes, Inchoate Liability, Accomplice Liability, and Defenses3.8. Substantive Law: Punishment: Incarceration and Confinement Sanctions3.9. Substantive Law: Physical Punishment Sentences3.10. Substantive Law: Monetary Punishment Sentences3.11. Substantive Law: Community-Based Sentences3.12. Procedural Law4.1. Importance of Policy in Criminal Justice4.2. The Myth of Moral Panics4.3. The Stages of Policy Development4.4. Importance of Evidence Based Practices4.5. Re-Evaluating Policy5.1. What is Theory?5.2. What Makes a Good Theory?5.4. Classical School5.5. Neoclassical5.6. Positivist Criminology5.7. Biological and Psychological Positivism5.8. The Chicago School5.9. Strain Theories5.10. Learning Theories5.11. Control Theories5.12. Other Criminological Theories6.1. Policing in Ancient Times6.2. Sir Robert Peel6.3. Policing Eras6.4. Levels of Policing and Role of Police6.5. Recruitment and Hiring in Policing6.6. Recruitment and Hiring Websites for Future Careers6.7. Police Misconduct, Accountability, and Corruption6.8. Current Issues: Police Shootings6.9. Current Issues: Use of Force and Vehicle Pursuits6.10. Current Issues: Stereotypes in Policing6.11. Current Issues: Accountability6.12. Current Issues: Internal Affairs and Discipline6.13.Current Issues: Body Cameras6.14. Myth: “Police Only Write Speeding Tickets to Harass Citizens and it is Entrapment.”7.1. Introduction to the U.S. Court System7.2. Jurisdiction7.3. Structure of the Courts: The Dual Court and Federal Court System7.4. Structure of the Courts: State Courts7.5. American Trial Courts and the Principle of Orality7.6. The Appeals Process, Standard of Review, and Appellate Decisions7.7. Federal Appellate Review of State Cases7.8. Courtroom Players: Judges and Court Staff7.9. Courtroom Players: Prosecutors7.10. Courtroom Workgroup: Defense Attorneys8.1. A Brief History of The Philosophies of Punishment8.2. Retribution8.3. Deterrence8.4. Incapacitation8.5. Rehabilitation8.6. Prisons and Jails8.7. A Brief History of Prisons and Jails8.8. Types of Jails8.9. Who Goes to Jail?8.10. Growth of Prisons in the United States8.11. Types of Prisons8.12. Prison Levels8.13. Who Goes to Prison?9.1. Diversion9.2. Intermediate Sanctions9.3. Probation9.4. Boot Camps/Shock Incarceration9.5. Drug Courts9.6. Halfway Houses9.8. House Arrest9.9. Community Residential Facilities9.10. Restorative Justice9.11. Parole9.12. Current Issues in Corrections9.13. Current Issues in Corrections: Mass Incarceration9.14. Current Issues in Corrections: War on Drugs and Gangs9.15. Current Issues in Corrections: Aging and Overcrowding9.16. Current Issues in Corrections: Reentry and the Future of Corrections10.1. Youth Crime10.2. Juvenile Justice10.3. History of the Juvenile Justice System10.4. Delinquency10.5. Juvenile Justice Process10.6. Due Process in the Juvenile Court10.7. The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 197410.8. Getting Tough: Initiatives for Punishment and Accountability10.9. Returning to Rehabilitation in the Contemporary Juvenile Justice System10.10. The Structure of the Juvenile Justice System10.11. Juvenile InstitutionsGlossary