Library/CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst)/ECONOMICS: CFA® Program Curriculum 2026 • LEVEL I • VOLUME 2/Learning Module 3 Fiscal Policy

Learning Module 3 Fiscal Policy

50 questions available

Take a quiz Listen to a podcast

Overview and Objectives of Fiscal Policy4 min

Fiscal policy is the set of government decisions on taxation and spending used to influence aggregate demand, redistribute income, and allocate resources. It contrasts with monetary policy, which is implemented by central banks and targets money, credit, and interest rates. The primary objectives of fiscal policy are to support stable positive growth, maintain low and stable inflation, and, where relevant, redistribute income. Fiscal instruments include transfer payments (social benefits and pensions), current government spending (public services such as health and education), capital expenditures (infrastructure and public investment), and taxes—direct (income, corporate) and indirect (VAT, excise duties). Analysts distinguish between the actual budget deficit (revenues minus expenditures in a period) and measures of fiscal stance such as the structural or cyclically adjusted budget deficit, which attempts to remove the effects of the business cycle and show policy orientation at full employment. Concerns about national debt relative to GDP have arguments both for and against: debt may be largely domestically held, fund productive investment, or be offset by private saving (Ricardian equivalence); conversely, high debt may raise future tax distortions, crowd out private investment, or lead to monetization and inflation if markets lose confidence. Tax policy is judged by simplicity, efficiency, fairness, and revenue sufficiency; trade-offs between these objectives are common.

Key Points

Fiscal policy uses spending and taxes to affect aggregate demand and distribution.
Main tools: transfer payments, current spending, capital spending, direct and indirect taxes.
Structural (cyclically adjusted) deficit attempts to measure fiscal stance at full employment.
Debate exists over whether high public debt relative to GDP is problematic.
Desirable tax attributes: simplicity, efficiency, fairness, revenue sufficiency.

Fiscal Tools, Multipliers, and Ricardian Equivalence4 min

Fiscal tools have differing speeds and impacts. Indirect taxes can be changed quickly and influence prices almost immediately; direct taxes and benefit systems are slower to change due to administrative systems; capital spending is slowest to plan and implement but builds productive capacity rather than only affecting demand. The fiscal multiplier quantifies how much output changes from an exogenous change in government spending or taxes. With a marginal propensity to consume c and a proportional tax rate t, the multiplier equals 1/[1 - c(1 - t)]. For example, with c = 0.9 and t = 0.2, the multiplier is 1/(1 - 0.9*0.8) = 3.57. A balanced-budget change (equal increase in G and in taxes) yields a balanced-budget multiplier of unity because the immediate increase in spending is only partially offset by the induced decline in consumption, and subsequent rounds amplify the initial net effect. Ricardian equivalence posits that households anticipate future taxes required to service government debt and therefore may save any tax cuts financed by borrowing, muting fiscal stimulus; its empirical validity is debated.

Key Points

Indirect taxes act fast; capital spending acts slowly but increases productive capacity.
Fiscal multiplier with taxes: 1/[1 - c(1 - t)].
Balanced-budget multiplier equals one in the basic model.
Ricardian equivalence suggests private saving offsets publicly financed tax cuts if households anticipate future taxes.

Implementation Challenges, Limits and Interaction with Monetary Policy5 min

Fiscal implementation faces substantial difficulties: recognition lags (data delays and revisions), action lags (time to legislate and implement changes), and impact lags (time for policy to affect output). Automatic stabilizers, such as progressive taxes and unemployment benefits, operate without discretionary action and dampen fluctuations by increasing deficits in downturns and surpluses in booms. Discretionary fiscal policy (tax rate changes or new spending programs) can be effective when there is significant spare capacity but is less effective near full employment and may provoke inflation. Additional limits include crowding out—government borrowing can compete for a limited pool of saving, raising interest rates and reducing private investment—and uncertainty over the neutral interest rate and potential for higher long-term rates if deficits are perceived as permanent. In deflationary or liquidity trap environments where policy rates are at or near zero, monetary policy may be constrained; fiscal stimulus may be warranted, and central banks may use unconventional tools (quantitative easing), but coordination and credibility between fiscal and monetary authorities are crucial. The interaction between fiscal and monetary policy matters: fiscal expansion combined with accommodative monetary policy produces larger multipliers than fiscal expansion with no monetary accommodation. Assessing fiscal stance therefore requires careful measurement (both nominal and cyclically adjusted balances), consideration of real versus nominal interest burdens (inflation erodes real debt), and appreciation of political and institutional constraints on implementation.

Key Points

Three lags hinder fiscal policy: recognition, action, and impact.
Automatic stabilizers operate countercyclically without new legislation.
Crowding out can reduce private investment when government borrows heavily.
Near zero interest rates or liquidity traps limit monetary policy; QE and fiscal policy interaction matter.
Credibility, timing, and institutional constraints shape policy effectiveness.

Questions

Question 1

Which of the following best defines fiscal policy?

Learning Module 3 Fiscal Policy

Questions

Other chapters