In a 2 x 3 x 4 factorial design, how many conditions are there?

Correct answer: 24

Explanation

Calculating the total number of experimental conditions in a multi-factor design requires multiplying the number of levels for every independent variable. In a 2 x 3 x 4 design, this product is 24, representing every unique combination of the variable levels.

Other questions

Question 1

In a factorial design, what does each combination of levels from different independent variables become?

Question 2

What is the primary reason researchers include multiple independent variables in a single experiment?

Question 3

How many conditions does a 3 x 2 factorial design have?

Question 4

In a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design, how many independent variables are being studied?

Question 5

What is a mixed factorial design?

Question 6

In a study with a non-manipulated independent variable, such as participant gender, what is a key limitation regarding causal conclusions?

Question 7

What distinguishes a non-experimental study with a factorial design from a factorial experiment?

Question 8

In a between-subjects factorial design, how many conditions is each participant tested in?

Question 9

An experiment on the effect of cell phone use (yes vs. no) and time of day (day vs. night) on driving ability is described as a '2 x 2' factorial design. What does this notation signify?

Question 10

A 4 x 5 factorial design would have how many total conditions?

Question 11

How many independent variables and levels are there in a 3 x 3 design?

Question 12

What is considered a primary advantage of a within-subjects factorial design?

Question 13

In the study by Schnall and colleagues on disgust and moral judgment, which of the variables was a non-manipulated independent variable?

Question 14

A study examining mood (positive vs. negative) and self-esteem (high vs. low) on willingness to have unprotected sex, where both mood and self-esteem are only measured, would be classified as what type of study?

Question 16

Why is it unusual in practice for factorial designs to have more than three independent variables?

Question 17

What is an 'interaction' between independent variables?

Question 18

Non-manipulated independent variables, such as private body consciousness or hypochondriasis, are usually what type of variables?

Question 19

Why must researchers be cautious about inferring causality from non-experimental studies, even when a factorial design is used?

Question 20

What is the most common approach to including multiple independent variables in an experiment?

Question 21

An experiment has two independent variables. The first has 2 levels and the second has 4 levels. What is the correct factorial notation for this design?

Question 22

In a within-subjects factorial design, how many conditions is each participant tested in?

Question 23

A researcher treats cell phone use as a within-subjects factor (testing participants with and without a phone) and time of day as a between-subjects factor (testing each participant only during the day or night). What is this design called?

Question 24

What is generally the method for assigning participants to conditions or orders of conditions in a factorial experiment, regardless of whether the design is between, within, or mixed?

Question 25

A factorial experiment is designed as a 2 × 2 × 2 × 3. How many independent variables are there in this study?

Question 26

What type of independent variable is by definition a between-subjects factor?

Question 27

In the study by Halle Brown and colleagues, participants' level of hypochondriasis (high or low) was a non-manipulated independent variable. This means that causal conclusions about the effect of hypochondriasis on memory would be...

Question 28

According to the text, a study is generally considered an experiment as long as what condition is met?

Question 29

If an experiment on driving ability used three types of cell phone use (handheld, hands-free, none) and two times of day (day, night), what would be its factorial design notation?

Question 30

Which type of factorial design is described as being conceptually simpler and avoiding order/carryover effects?

Question 31

If a researcher finds an interaction between disgust and private body consciousness, what does this result mean?

Question 32

What potential third variable is mentioned in the text that could explain the relationship between a strict moral code and heightened body awareness?

Question 33

A factorial design is represented by the notation 5 x 2. How many independent variables are there, and how many levels does the second variable have?

Question 34

Why would researchers choose to use a factorial design instead of conducting separate studies for each independent variable?

Question 35

In a 2 x 2 between-subjects factorial design with 4 conditions, how many participants would be needed at a minimum to have one participant per condition?

Question 36

If a study has a factorial design but measures only pre-existing attributes of people (e.g., their personality and their mood) to see how they relate to a behavior, it is considered:

Question 37

How many independent variables and total conditions are there in a 2 x 2 x 3 design?

Question 38

The study by MacDonald and Martineau (2002), which manipulated participants' moods to examine effects on self-esteem and intentions, was considered an experiment because:

Question 39

What is the term for an independent variable that is measured by the researcher but not manipulated?

Question 40

A study with a 2 x 4 factorial design is conducted. How many independent variables does this study have?

Question 41

In a 2 x 2 within-subjects factorial experiment, how many participants would be needed at a minimum to have data for all conditions?

Question 42

A 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design would have a total of how many conditions?

Question 43

What is the defining characteristic of factors in a factorial design?

Question 44

If a researcher adds a fourth independent variable with three levels to a 2 x 2 x 2 design, how many distinct conditions would the new design have?

Question 45

What is the main advantage of including multiple independent variables in one study compared to conducting one study on the effect of disgust and another on the effect of private body consciousness on moral judgment?

Question 46

A non-manipulated independent variable like gender is considered a between-subjects factor because...

Question 47

In a hypothetical 2 × 2 factorial design, a researcher finds that cell phone use impairs driving at night but has no effect on driving during the day. This finding is an example of:

Question 48

A research design is notated as 3 x 4. How many levels does the first independent variable have?

Question 49

When a factorial design is used in a non-experimental study, what problem might arise if one finds that people in a positive mood with high self-esteem are more willing to engage in a certain behavior?

Question 50

A researcher wants to study the effects of caffeine (0mg, 100mg) and sleep (6 hours, 8 hours) on memory. All participants experience all four possible conditions. What type of design is this?