An appellate court would review a trial judge's decision to suppress evidence because it is considered a matter of what?
Explanation
This question tests the student's ability to classify a specific judicial action (suppressing evidence) as a matter of law appropriate for appellate review.
Other questions
What is the definition of 'jurisdiction' as provided in the text?
Based on their function, what is the primary role of trial courts?
What is the primary concern of appellate courts when reviewing a case?
Which of the following is an example of jurisdiction based on the subject matter of the case?
According to the text, how do appellate courts conduct their review of trial court decisions?
What type of jurisdiction do courts that handle infractions, violations, and petty crimes (misdemeanors) have?
Which concept of jurisdiction is tied to the system of federalism and the autonomy of national and state governments?
What kind of factual question would a trial court be responsible for answering?
What is an example of a court that has jurisdiction based on its authority over the specific parties involved?
According to the text, courts that are not limited to a particular subject and may deal with all fields are described as having what?
What is the key difference between a trial court and an appellate court regarding how they handle evidence?
A court that has the authority to try serious crimes like felonies is known as a court of what?
According to Kerper's note on subject matter jurisdiction, what is a common area delegated to specialized courts?
What function do appellate courts perform when they determine if there is legally sufficient evidence to uphold a conviction?
The fact that an Oregon court does not have jurisdiction over a crime committed in California is an example of what type of jurisdiction?
Which court is responsible for determining if a probationer willfully violated the terms of their probation?
According to the text, what is another term for 'courts of limited jurisdiction'?
What type of jurisdiction is based on the court's authority over dependency and delinquency cases involving youth?
What does the text say appellate courts do when new legal questions arise?
According to the Kerper quote, which type of court is NOT an example of a specialized court?
Trial courts are primarily concerned with facts, while appellate courts are primarily concerned with what?
In the federal system, specialized courts exist for areas such as customs and what other field mentioned in the text?
What is the result of the trial court process, as described in the section on jurisdiction by function?
The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Services is an example of a court with jurisdiction based on what?
What is the fundamental difference in the concerns of a trial court versus an appellate court?
Which of these is NOT a basis for jurisdiction as described in the chapter?
Which term describes a court's authority to hear a wide variety of cases, not limited to a specific legal field?
What is the primary document an appellate court uses to review a trial court's proceedings?
What kind of matters do trial courts have jurisdiction over?
Which question would be addressed by an appellate court, not a trial court?
The distinction between courts that handle felonies and courts that handle misdemeanors is a form of jurisdiction based on what?
Courts-martial fall under which category of jurisdiction?
According to the text, what do federal courts have jurisdiction over?
What do trial courts do that appellate courts do not?
Which of the following is NOT a type of jurisdiction mentioned in the text?
A court that handles divorce, adoption, and other aspects of family law is an example of what type of court?
What does the text identify as the 'legal suit' that jurisdiction gives a court authority over?
What is the primary activity of a trial court according to the section 'Trial Courts versus Appellate Courts'?
A court that can try both serious crimes (felonies) and minor crimes is known as a court of:
Which court type is responsible for correcting legal errors made by trial courts?
Traditionally, what types of cases are assigned to courts with general jurisdiction?
What authority do courts of limited jurisdiction have?
According to the text, the distinction between different trial courts is primarily utilized based on what type of jurisdictional distinction?
State courts having jurisdiction over state matters is a principle derived from what system?
Which court hierarchy divides trial courts and appellate courts in both federal and state systems?
According to the text, why are trial courts in a position to determine guilt and impose punishments?
What is the scope of jurisdiction for state courts as defined by the principle of federalism?
Which of these is NOT an example of a factual question a trial court would answer?
The jurisdictional distinction based on subject matter is primarily used to distinguish between what?