DESIGN VIA STATE SPACE

50 questions available

Summary unavailable.

Questions

Question 1

What is a primary advantage of state-space design methods over frequency domain methods, such as root locus?

View answer and explanation
Question 2

In the context of controller design for a plant in phase-variable form, what is the fundamental principle behind pole placement?

View answer and explanation
Question 3

For the plant G(s) = 20(s + 5) / [s(s + 1)(s + 4)], a controller is designed to yield a 9.5 percent overshoot and a 0.74 second settling time, resulting in a desired characteristic equation of s^3 + 15.9s^2 + 136.08s + 413.1 = 0. What is the required value for the feedback gain k3?

View answer and explanation
Question 4

According to Section 12.3, what is the definition of a controllable system?

View answer and explanation
Question 5

What is the correct formulation of the controllability matrix (CM) for an nth-order plant?

View answer and explanation
Question 6

In Example 12.2, a system is given with state equation matrices A = [[-1, 1, 0], [0, -1, 0], [0, 0, -2]] and B = [[0], [1], [1]]. What is the determinant of its controllability matrix, CM?

View answer and explanation
Question 7

For a system not in phase-variable form, a transformation z = Px is used. How is the transformation matrix P calculated to convert the system to phase-variable form for controller design?

View answer and explanation
Question 8

In Example 12.4, a state-variable feedback controller is designed for a plant to yield a 20.8 percent overshoot and a settling time of 4 seconds. The third closed-loop pole is chosen to cancel the closed-loop zero at s = -4. What is the desired characteristic equation for the closed-loop system?

View answer and explanation
Question 9

What is the primary purpose of an observer in a state-space control system design?

View answer and explanation
Question 10

The dynamics of the estimation error, e_x, in a closed-loop observer are governed by which state equation?

View answer and explanation
Question 11

In Example 12.5, an observer is designed for a plant. The observer is specified to respond 10 times faster than the controlled loop from Example 12.4, which had dominant poles at -1 +/- j2. The third observer pole is placed at -100. What is the desired characteristic polynomial for the observer?

View answer and explanation
Question 12

What is the definition of an observable system?

View answer and explanation
Question 13

What is the correct mathematical formulation of the observability matrix (OM) for an nth-order plant?

View answer and explanation
Question 14

In Example 12.6, for a system with matrices A = [[0, 1, 0], [0, 0, 1], [-4, -3, -2]] and C = [0, 5, 1], what is the determinant of the observability matrix, OM?

View answer and explanation
Question 15

For designing an observer for a system not in observer canonical form, a transformation z = Px is used. How is the transformation matrix P calculated?

View answer and explanation
Question 16

In Example 12.9, an observer is designed for a plant modeling blood glucose level. The desired transient response is described by a damping ratio of 0.7 and a natural frequency of 100. What is the value of the observer gain l1?

View answer and explanation
Question 17

How is zero steady-state error for a step input typically achieved in state-space design?

View answer and explanation
Question 18

In Example 12.10, an integral controller is designed for a plant with state equations defined by A = [[0, 1], [-3, -5]] and C = [1, 0]. The desired third-order characteristic polynomial is s^3 + 116s^2 + 1783.1s + 18,310 = 0. What is the required value for the integrator gain, Ke?

View answer and explanation
Question 19

In the Antenna Control Case Study, a controller is designed to yield a 10 percent overshoot and a settling time of 1 second, with a third pole at -40. What is the desired characteristic equation for this controller design?

View answer and explanation
Question 20

In the Antenna Control Case Study, based on the desired characteristic equation of s^3 + 48s^2 + 365.8s + 1832 = 0, what is the calculated value for the feedback gain k1?

View answer and explanation
Question 21

For the observer design in the Antenna Control Case Study, the observer poles are specified to yield 10 percent overshoot and a natural frequency 10 times that of the controller's dominant pair (which was 6.77 rad/s). The observer's third pole is placed at -400. What is the characteristic equation for the observer?

View answer and explanation
Question 22

Based on the observer design in the Antenna Control Case Study, which uses the desired characteristic equation from Eq. (12.140), what is the calculated value for the observer gain l1?

View answer and explanation
Question 23

Which state-space form is noted in Section 12.2 as yielding the simplest evaluation of the feedback gains for controller design?

View answer and explanation
Question 24

In a state-space system with state feedback, the control input u is defined by the equation u = r - Kx. What does the vector K represent?

View answer and explanation
Question 25

When is pole placement considered a viable design technique for a controller?

View answer and explanation
Question 26

What is the primary reason for designing an observer's response to be much faster than the controlled closed-loop system's response?

View answer and explanation
Question 27

In a system with a diagonal system matrix and distinct eigenvalues, how can uncontrollability be identified by inspection?

View answer and explanation
Question 28

In the controller design by matching coefficients in Example 12.3, for a plant Y(s)/U(s) = 10/[(s+1)(s+2)], the desired characteristic equation is s^2 + 16s + 239.5 = 0. What is the value of the feedback gain k2?

View answer and explanation
Question 29

What is a significant disadvantage of state-space design methods mentioned in the introduction of Chapter 12?

View answer and explanation
Question 30

After designing feedback gains Kx for a system transformed to phase-variable form, how is the gain vector Kz for the original system representation found?

View answer and explanation
Question 31

What condition must be met for a system represented in parallel form with distinct eigenvalues to be observable by inspection?

View answer and explanation
Question 32

In Example 12.7, a system has state matrices A = [[0, 1], [-5, -21/4]] and C = [5, 4]. What is the rank of its observability matrix, OM?

View answer and explanation
Question 33

After designing an observer gain vector Lx for a system transformed to observer canonical form, how is the gain vector Lz for the original system representation found?

View answer and explanation
Question 34

Which canonical form is most convenient for designing an observer?

View answer and explanation
Question 35

When adding integral control to a state-space system, a new state variable, xN, is introduced. What does the derivative of this state variable, xN_dot, represent?

View answer and explanation
Question 36

Consider the plant from Example 12.10, G(s) = 1/(s^2+5s+3). A controller without integral control is designed for a 10 percent overshoot. What is the steady-state error for a unit step input?

View answer and explanation
Question 37

The design of state-variable feedback for closed-loop pole placement consists of equating the characteristic equation of the closed-loop system with a desired characteristic equation. For a plant in phase-variable form, what is the closed-loop system matrix?

View answer and explanation
Question 38

In Skill-Assessment Exercise 12.1, for the plant G(s) = 100(s+10)/[s(s+3)(s+12)], the feedback gains are designed to yield 5 percent overshoot and a peak time of 0.3 second. What is the value of the feedback gain associated with the most significant coefficient of the characteristic equation?

View answer and explanation
Question 39

What is the key difference between an open-loop observer and a closed-loop observer as described in Section 12.5?

View answer and explanation
Question 40

In the Antenna Control Case Study, the plant transfer function is G(s) = 1325/[s(s^2 + 101.71s + 171)]. What is the system matrix A for this plant when represented in phase-variable form?

View answer and explanation
Question 41

What must be the rank of the controllability matrix, CM, for an nth-order plant to be considered completely controllable?

View answer and explanation
Question 42

In Skill-Assessment Exercise 12.2, a system is given by matrices A = [[-1, 1, 2], [0, -1, 5], [0, 3, -4]] and B = [[2], [1], [1]]. Is this system controllable?

View answer and explanation
Question 43

What is the final step in determining observability if the observability matrix, OM, is a square matrix?

View answer and explanation
Question 44

In the state-space representation of a system, what does the output equation y = Cx signify?

View answer and explanation
Question 45

In Example 12.8, an observer is designed by transformation for a plant G(s) = 1/[(s+1)(s+2)(s+5)]. What is the determinant of the observability matrix for the original cascade form, OMz?

View answer and explanation
Question 46

Why might a state-space design prove to be very sensitive to parameter changes?

View answer and explanation
Question 47

According to the topology for pole placement described in Section 12.2, how many adjustable feedback gains are required for an nth-order system?

View answer and explanation
Question 48

What is the steady-state error for the integral-controlled system designed in Example 12.10 for a unit step input?

View answer and explanation
Question 49

In the Case Study observer design, the observer's characteristic equation is specified in Eq. 12.140. What is the value of the observer gain l3?

View answer and explanation
Question 50

The final transfer function for the designed controller in Example 12.1 is T(s) = 20(s+5)/(s^3 + 15.9s^2 + 136.08s + 413.1). A simulation of this system shows a steady-state response that approaches 0.24 instead of unity. What does this indicate?

View answer and explanation