Learning Module 9 Option Replication Using Put–Call Parity
47 questions available
Key Points
- Put–call parity: S0 + p0 = c0 + PV(X) for European options on non-income underlyings.
- Protective put and fiduciary call have identical payoffs at T, hence equal prices at t = 0.
- Rearrangements produce synthetic positions and pricing formulas for missing option prices.
- Parity violations imply arbitrage opportunities: buy the low-cost portfolio, sell the high-cost one.
Key Points
- Replication maps options to combinations of calls, puts, underlying, and bonds.
- Covered call equals long PV bond minus long put: S0 - c0 = PV(X) - p0.
- Arbitrage procedure: identify inequality, construct opposite portfolios, lock in riskless profit.
- Examples show step-by-step algebra and cash flows at t = 0 and T.
Key Points
- Put–call forward parity: F0(T)(1 + r)^{-T} + p0 = c0 + PV(X).
- Useful when forward prices are observed or used for synthetic underlying construction.
- Leads to formulas connecting p0, c0, F0(T), and PV(X) for arbitrage tests.
- Enables replication using forwards plus bonds and options.
Key Points
- Equity resembles a call option on firm assets; debt resembles risk-free bond minus a put.
- Put values can be interpreted as credit-risk premia in firm valuation.
- Parity links derivative pricing to corporate capital structure insights.
- Practical examples show numerical derivation of put or call premiums given firm/debt parameters.
Key Points
- Typical problems: solve for p0 given c0, S0, PV(X); solve for c0 given p0 and PV(X).
- Check parity before trading; small pricing frictions in real markets can prevent pure arbitrage.
- Remember the assumptions: European options, no income on underlying, frictionless markets.
- Use parity to derive synthetic strategies and to interpret market-implied credit risk.
Questions
If S0 = 120, c0 = 6, PV(X) = 110, what is the put price p0 implied by put–call parity?
View answer and explanationA covered call consists of holding the stock and selling a call. Using put–call parity, which portfolio is equivalent to a covered call (S0 - c0)?
View answer and explanationAn investor observes c0 = 10, S0 = 200, PV(X) = 190. Using put–call parity, what is the no-arbitrage put price p0?
View answer and explanationWhich of the following identities is a correct rearrangement of put–call parity S0 + p0 = c0 + PV(X)?
View answer and explanationA six-month European call has price 12, the underlying spot is 140, PV(X) = 130. What action yields arbitrage if observed put price is 5?
View answer and explanationIn put–call forward parity, which expression correctly links forward price F0(T), put p0, call c0, and PV(X)?
View answer and explanationIf F0(T) = 210 and PV(X) = 200 and c0 = 15, what is implied p0 from put–call forward parity (assume discounting accounted in PV)?
View answer and explanationA six-month call with strike 100 is trading at 7, S0 = 95, PV(X) = 97. Using put–call parity, what is the price of the put p0?
View answer and explanationWhich of the following is a correct interpretation of a fiduciary call?
View answer and explanationIf put–call parity does not hold in markets, what is the immediate implication under textbook assumptions?
View answer and explanationA six-month forward on a stock has forward price F0(T) = 102 and PV(F0(T)) = 100. An at-the-money call (strike 100) costs c0 = 4. Using put–call forward parity, what is p0 if PV(X) = 100?
View answer and explanationA protective put (long stock S0 + long put p0) and a fiduciary call (long call c0 + long bond PV(X)) have identical payoffs. Which assumption is essential for that equality in the chapter?
View answer and explanationYou observe S0 = 80, c0 = 3, PV(X) = 78. If a put trades at p0 = 6, is there an arbitrage? If so, which side is overpriced?
View answer and explanationA trader wants to synthetically create a long underlying position using options and bonds per parity. Which portfolio replicates S0?
View answer and explanationA six-month call is 9, the corresponding put is 4, PV(X) = 100. What is the implied spot S0 by parity?
View answer and explanationA trader sees a put price higher than parity-implied p0. Which arbitrage action is consistent with the chapter?
View answer and explanationHow does put–call parity help determine missing option premium when only call is quoted and underlying and PV(X) known?
View answer and explanationWhich portfolio equivalence illustrates that a debtholder position is like a risk-free bond minus a put on firm value?
View answer and explanationIf a firm has asset value V0, debt face value D, and put price on firm value p0, what formula links these per the chapter?
View answer and explanationWhich of the following best describes the synthetic protective put introduced in the chapter?
View answer and explanationIf parity implies p0 = 25 and market put sells for 30, which of these steps yields arbitrage profit under textbook assumptions?
View answer and explanationWhich of the following is a correct economic interpretation from the chapter: equity holders in a levered firm resemble which options position?
View answer and explanationA firm has debt D = 100 and PV(D) = 90, observed put on firm value p0 = 12, what call c0 does parity imply for firm assets valued at V0 = 50?
View answer and explanationWhich of the following best describes a covered call strategy payoff at expiration?
View answer and explanationWhich algebraic relationship shows that a put can be replicated using a call, a bond, and short underlying as given in the chapter?
View answer and explanationA trader uses put–call forward parity to relate forward and option prices. If F0(T) > X, what sign does p0 - c0 have according to equation p0 - c0 = [X - F0(T)](1 + r)^{-T}?
View answer and explanationWhich of these steps correctly describes creating a fiduciary call at inception per the chapter?
View answer and explanationSuppose S0 + p0 < c0 + PV(X). According to the chapter, what arbitrage action should be taken?
View answer and explanationA call and put share identical strike and maturity. Which combination yields a synthetic forward position according to parity concepts in the chapter?
View answer and explanationA market shows c0 = 2, p0 = 1, S0 = 50, PV(X) = 52. Is parity satisfied and what is the implication?
View answer and explanationWhich of these is a direct consequence of put–call parity for option market makers?
View answer and explanationA European call with X = 100 trades at 12 and the put at same X trades at 9. If S0 = 95, what is PV(X) implied by parity?
View answer and explanationIn the chapter example, what is the covered call implicit call price if S0 = 295, PV(X) = 259.85, and put p0 = 56?
View answer and explanationWhich statement correctly links credit spreads and put prices as explained in the chapter?
View answer and explanationA trader wants to create a synthetic long forward using options and bonds at t = 0. Which combination from parity will achieve this?
View answer and explanationWhich of the following is a correct step when executing a parity arbitrage in practice as given in chapter examples?
View answer and explanationWhich of the following numerical examples from the chapter demonstrates computing a missing put when c0 = 59, S0 = 295 and PV(X) = 259.85?
View answer and explanationWhich practical limitation does the chapter acknowledge may prevent pure parity arbitrage in real markets?
View answer and explanationA trader uses parity to check consistency between option and forward markets. If parity suggests p0 - c0 = -2 and observed p0 - c0 = 1, what does chapter recommend?
View answer and explanationWhich of the following transformations illustrates that selling a put and buying a call equals short underlying plus long PV(X) per chapter algebra?
View answer and explanationWhich of the following example outcomes in the chapter illustrates the numerical arbitrage profit when parity is violated?
View answer and explanationWhy does put–call parity require European options in the chapter's basic form?
View answer and explanationWhich equation from the chapter expresses the protective put payoff at expiry equals fiduciary call payoff?
View answer and explanationA practitioner wants to price a covered call using a traded put and PV(X). If p0 = 12 and PV(X) = 110 and S0 = 130, what is call price c0 implied by parity-algebra used in chapter?
View answer and explanationWhich parity-based identity supports the statement that shareholders have limited downside and unlimited upside relative to debtholders?
View answer and explanationWhich of the following numerical tests would confirm put–call forward parity consistency in market quotes as per chapter procedure?
View answer and explanationIn practice, why might put–call parity be used by traders beyond finding arbitrage, according to chapter discussion?
View answer and explanation