Learning Module 9 Option Replication Using Put–Call Parity

47 questions available

Overview and Put-Call Parity Statement5 min
This chapter explains put–call parity for European options and its extension to forward contracts (put–call forward parity). Put–call parity: for European options on a non-dividend-paying underlying with the same strike X and maturity T, the no-arbitrage relationship is S0 + p0 = c0 + PV(X), where PV(X) = X(1 + r)^{-T}. This equality arises because a protective put (long underlying + long put) and a fiduciary call (long call + long risk-free bond paying X at T) deliver identical payoffs at expiration in all states. If prices depart from this equality, arbitrage strategies (buy the cheap portfolio, sell the expensive one, and finance appropriately) produce riskless profits. Rearranged forms provide synthetic positions: S0 = c0 - p0 + PV(X); p0 = c0 + PV(X) - S0; c0 = S0 + p0 - PV(X). Put–call forward parity substitutes a synthetic underlying (long forward + risk-free bond) for the cash underlying: F0(T)(1 + r)^{-T} + p0 = c0 + PV(X), where F0(T)(1 + r)^{-T} denotes the present value of the forward price. Rearranged, p0 - c0 = [X - F0(T)](1 + r)^{-T}, which shows equivalence between (long put + short call) and (long PV-bond + short forward). The chapter demonstrates how to use parity to price missing option premiums given traded primitives and to construct covered-call and synthetic-protective-put relationships (covered call = long bond - short put; fiduciary call = protective put).

Key Points

  • Put–call parity: S0 + p0 = c0 + PV(X) for European options on non-income underlyings.
  • Protective put and fiduciary call have identical payoffs at T, hence equal prices at t = 0.
  • Rearrangements produce synthetic positions and pricing formulas for missing option prices.
  • Parity violations imply arbitrage opportunities: buy the low-cost portfolio, sell the high-cost one.
Replication, Synthetic Positions, and Arbitrage Mechanics5 min
Practical replication uses parity to build equivalent portfolios: a covered call (long underlying, short call) is equivalent to long PV(X) bond minus long put (S0 - c0 = PV(X) - p0). Similarly, p0 = c0 + PV(X) - S0 shows a put as a portfolio of a long call, a long PV bond, and a short underlying. When parity fails in observed prices, one can perform arbitrage: if S0 + p0 > c0 + PV(X), sell S0 and p0, buy c0 and PV(X), pocket initial cash difference, and unwind at T for zero net liability but positive initial cash. Steps must include borrowing/lending at the risk-free rate and being long/short the correct instruments in the right quantities. Examples highlight numerical computations (solve for p0 given c0, S0, PV(X); compute covered call implied call price from put price).

Key Points

  • Replication maps options to combinations of calls, puts, underlying, and bonds.
  • Covered call equals long PV bond minus long put: S0 - c0 = PV(X) - p0.
  • Arbitrage procedure: identify inequality, construct opposite portfolios, lock in riskless profit.
  • Examples show step-by-step algebra and cash flows at t = 0 and T.
Put-Call Forward Parity and Forward-Based Replication5 min
Put–call forward parity replaces the cash underlying with a synthetic underlying (long forward plus PV of forward price), yielding F0(T)(1 + r)^{-T} + p0 = c0 + PV(X). This form is useful when forwards rather than cash positions are traded or when financing is structured via forward contracts. Rearranging demonstrates equivalence: p0 - c0 = [X - F0(T)](1 + r)^{-T}. Using these relationships, one can construct synthetic protective puts and fiduciary calls where the synthetic underlying substitutes for S0. The parity explains how option and forward prices interact in arbitrage-free markets. Applications include pricing puts from calls and forwards, and checking consistency between option markets and forward markets.

Key Points

  • Put–call forward parity: F0(T)(1 + r)^{-T} + p0 = c0 + PV(X).
  • Useful when forward prices are observed or used for synthetic underlying construction.
  • Leads to formulas connecting p0, c0, F0(T), and PV(X) for arbitrage tests.
  • Enables replication using forwards plus bonds and options.
Applications to Strategies and Firm Capital Structure5 min
Put–call parity applies beyond simple option trades. Covered-call and protective-put strategies are reinterpretations of parity equations. The chapter discusses an example where equity equals a call on firm assets with strike equal to debt face value; E0 approximates c0 when firm assets and debt map to option constructs. Debtholders effectively hold PV(D) minus a put on firm value, connecting credit risk to put values. Thus, the put price can be viewed as reflecting credit spreads; increases in default risk raise p0 and affect the decomposition V0 = c0 + PV(D) - p0. These mappings provide intuition for corporate finance applications: equity upside and limited downside mirror call option payoff; debt combines risk-free payoff and sold put exposure.

Key Points

  • Equity resembles a call option on firm assets; debt resembles risk-free bond minus a put.
  • Put values can be interpreted as credit-risk premia in firm valuation.
  • Parity links derivative pricing to corporate capital structure insights.
  • Practical examples show numerical derivation of put or call premiums given firm/debt parameters.
Worked Examples and Common Problem Types5 min
The chapter contains worked problems: computing missing option premiums using S0 + p0 = c0 + PV(X); computing lower and upper bounds for option prices (calls bounded above by S0 and below by Max(0, S0 - PV(X)); puts bounded above by X and below by Max(0, PV(X) - S0)); verifying arbitrage trades when parity violated; converting covered-call positions into bond-and-put positions numerically; and forward-parity calculations substituting observed forward prices. Students are guided to ensure correct discounting at risk-free rates and consistent use of European exercise assumptions. Emphasis is placed on frictionless markets and non-dividend-paying underlyings as core assumptions for the algebra to hold exactly.

Key Points

  • Typical problems: solve for p0 given c0, S0, PV(X); solve for c0 given p0 and PV(X).
  • Check parity before trading; small pricing frictions in real markets can prevent pure arbitrage.
  • Remember the assumptions: European options, no income on underlying, frictionless markets.
  • Use parity to derive synthetic strategies and to interpret market-implied credit risk.

Questions

Question 1

If S0 = 120, c0 = 6, PV(X) = 110, what is the put price p0 implied by put–call parity?

View answer and explanation
Question 2

A covered call consists of holding the stock and selling a call. Using put–call parity, which portfolio is equivalent to a covered call (S0 - c0)?

View answer and explanation
Question 3

An investor observes c0 = 10, S0 = 200, PV(X) = 190. Using put–call parity, what is the no-arbitrage put price p0?

View answer and explanation
Question 4

Which of the following identities is a correct rearrangement of put–call parity S0 + p0 = c0 + PV(X)?

View answer and explanation
Question 5

A six-month European call has price 12, the underlying spot is 140, PV(X) = 130. What action yields arbitrage if observed put price is 5?

View answer and explanation
Question 6

In put–call forward parity, which expression correctly links forward price F0(T), put p0, call c0, and PV(X)?

View answer and explanation
Question 7

If F0(T) = 210 and PV(X) = 200 and c0 = 15, what is implied p0 from put–call forward parity (assume discounting accounted in PV)?

View answer and explanation
Question 8

A six-month call with strike 100 is trading at 7, S0 = 95, PV(X) = 97. Using put–call parity, what is the price of the put p0?

View answer and explanation
Question 9

Which of the following is a correct interpretation of a fiduciary call?

View answer and explanation
Question 10

If put–call parity does not hold in markets, what is the immediate implication under textbook assumptions?

View answer and explanation
Question 11

A six-month forward on a stock has forward price F0(T) = 102 and PV(F0(T)) = 100. An at-the-money call (strike 100) costs c0 = 4. Using put–call forward parity, what is p0 if PV(X) = 100?

View answer and explanation
Question 12

A protective put (long stock S0 + long put p0) and a fiduciary call (long call c0 + long bond PV(X)) have identical payoffs. Which assumption is essential for that equality in the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 13

You observe S0 = 80, c0 = 3, PV(X) = 78. If a put trades at p0 = 6, is there an arbitrage? If so, which side is overpriced?

View answer and explanation
Question 14

A trader wants to synthetically create a long underlying position using options and bonds per parity. Which portfolio replicates S0?

View answer and explanation
Question 15

A six-month call is 9, the corresponding put is 4, PV(X) = 100. What is the implied spot S0 by parity?

View answer and explanation
Question 16

A trader sees a put price higher than parity-implied p0. Which arbitrage action is consistent with the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 17

How does put–call parity help determine missing option premium when only call is quoted and underlying and PV(X) known?

View answer and explanation
Question 18

Which portfolio equivalence illustrates that a debtholder position is like a risk-free bond minus a put on firm value?

View answer and explanation
Question 19

If a firm has asset value V0, debt face value D, and put price on firm value p0, what formula links these per the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 20

Which of the following best describes the synthetic protective put introduced in the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 21

If parity implies p0 = 25 and market put sells for 30, which of these steps yields arbitrage profit under textbook assumptions?

View answer and explanation
Question 22

Which of the following is a correct economic interpretation from the chapter: equity holders in a levered firm resemble which options position?

View answer and explanation
Question 23

A firm has debt D = 100 and PV(D) = 90, observed put on firm value p0 = 12, what call c0 does parity imply for firm assets valued at V0 = 50?

View answer and explanation
Question 24

Which of the following best describes a covered call strategy payoff at expiration?

View answer and explanation
Question 25

Which algebraic relationship shows that a put can be replicated using a call, a bond, and short underlying as given in the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 26

A trader uses put–call forward parity to relate forward and option prices. If F0(T) > X, what sign does p0 - c0 have according to equation p0 - c0 = [X - F0(T)](1 + r)^{-T}?

View answer and explanation
Question 27

Which of these steps correctly describes creating a fiduciary call at inception per the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 28

Suppose S0 + p0 < c0 + PV(X). According to the chapter, what arbitrage action should be taken?

View answer and explanation
Question 29

A call and put share identical strike and maturity. Which combination yields a synthetic forward position according to parity concepts in the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 30

A market shows c0 = 2, p0 = 1, S0 = 50, PV(X) = 52. Is parity satisfied and what is the implication?

View answer and explanation
Question 31

Which of these is a direct consequence of put–call parity for option market makers?

View answer and explanation
Question 32

A European call with X = 100 trades at 12 and the put at same X trades at 9. If S0 = 95, what is PV(X) implied by parity?

View answer and explanation
Question 33

In the chapter example, what is the covered call implicit call price if S0 = 295, PV(X) = 259.85, and put p0 = 56?

View answer and explanation
Question 34

Which statement correctly links credit spreads and put prices as explained in the chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 35

A trader wants to create a synthetic long forward using options and bonds at t = 0. Which combination from parity will achieve this?

View answer and explanation
Question 36

Which of the following is a correct step when executing a parity arbitrage in practice as given in chapter examples?

View answer and explanation
Question 37

Which of the following numerical examples from the chapter demonstrates computing a missing put when c0 = 59, S0 = 295 and PV(X) = 259.85?

View answer and explanation
Question 38

Which practical limitation does the chapter acknowledge may prevent pure parity arbitrage in real markets?

View answer and explanation
Question 39

A trader uses parity to check consistency between option and forward markets. If parity suggests p0 - c0 = -2 and observed p0 - c0 = 1, what does chapter recommend?

View answer and explanation
Question 40

Which of the following transformations illustrates that selling a put and buying a call equals short underlying plus long PV(X) per chapter algebra?

View answer and explanation
Question 41

Which of the following example outcomes in the chapter illustrates the numerical arbitrage profit when parity is violated?

View answer and explanation
Question 42

Why does put–call parity require European options in the chapter's basic form?

View answer and explanation
Question 43

Which equation from the chapter expresses the protective put payoff at expiry equals fiduciary call payoff?

View answer and explanation
Question 44

A practitioner wants to price a covered call using a traded put and PV(X). If p0 = 12 and PV(X) = 110 and S0 = 130, what is call price c0 implied by parity-algebra used in chapter?

View answer and explanation
Question 45

Which parity-based identity supports the statement that shareholders have limited downside and unlimited upside relative to debtholders?

View answer and explanation
Question 46

Which of the following numerical tests would confirm put–call forward parity consistency in market quotes as per chapter procedure?

View answer and explanation
Question 47

In practice, why might put–call parity be used by traders beyond finding arbitrage, according to chapter discussion?

View answer and explanation