What does the text advise about reporting a study's limitations in the Discussion section?
Explanation
Acknowledging limitations is a key part of scientific integrity. The goal is not to list every flaw, but to engage in a thoughtful critique of the study's most important potential weaknesses and their impact on the conclusions.
Other questions
In which section of an APA-style empirical research report is the primary purpose to describe how the study was conducted in enough detail for replication?
What is the recommended maximum length for a title in an APA-style research report?
According to the text, what is the typical word limit for an abstract in an APA-style manuscript?
What is the primary function of the literature review within the introduction of an APA-style report?
What are the two essential elements that should be included in the closing of the introduction section?
In an APA-style method section, what is the difference between the 'design' and 'procedure' subsections?
Which of the following is NOT listed as a standard element of the Discussion section in an APA-style report?
In what order do Appendices, Tables, and Figures appear in an APA-style manuscript?
According to researcher Daryl Bem's recommendation for the opening of an introduction, what is a good way to capture the reader's attention?
What is the correct way to format the heading for the introduction section of an APA-style manuscript?
When describing a study's procedure, what is the recommended approach?
What is the purpose of the 'author note' on the title page for articles being submitted for publication?
Which of the following preliminary issues should typically be addressed at the beginning of the Results section?
What is the primary characteristic of the literature review that distinguishes it from a simple list of past studies?
How many limitations does the text suggest picking for discussion in the Discussion section?
What is the purpose of an appendix in an APA-style research report?
Which of these is NOT a standard subsection of the introduction?
According to the text, when is it particularly useful to have a 'Materials' subsection within the Method section?
What does the text say about including raw data in the Results section of a published report?
What is the first element in Daryl Bem's suggested five-step structure for discussing each new result in the Results section?
How does the Discussion section typically begin?
What advice does the text give regarding the balance of the literature review?
Which of the following is NOT a component of the Participants subsection in the Method section?
What is the purpose of a manipulation check, and in which section is it typically reported?
When ending a discussion section, what does the text suggest is often a better alternative to a 'sweeping or thought-provoking conclusion'?
What type of information is NOT considered an 'irrelevant detail' to be avoided in the Method section?
In a report with multiple appendices, how should they be labeled?
What is the primary function of an APA-style empirical research report?
According to the 'Breaking the Rules' box, why was the humorous anecdote used by researcher Larry Jacoby considered highly effective?
How should the reference list be organized?
If two sources in a reference list have the exact same authors, how are they ordered?
Which of the three organizational approaches for the Method section is described as working well for methods that are relatively simple?
What is the primary function of the abstract?
Where on the page should the title of an APA-style research report be centered?
According to the text, the closing statement of the introduction in Darley and Latané's (1968) classic article on the bystander effect is an example of what?
In the Results section, what is the second step in the five-step structure for discussing a new result, as suggested by Bem (2003)?
Where would you typically present statistics like test-retest correlations or Cronbach's alpha to show that measures are reliable and valid?
Which section of an APA-style report starts on the second page of the manuscript?
If a manuscript has only one appendix, what should its heading be?
What is the primary content of the 'opening' of an introduction?
What is a key difference in how tables and figures are titled in APA style?
In what order are the standard sections of an APA-style empirical research report arranged?
When is it NOT necessary to include an author note on the title page?
Which of these is NOT one of the five elements of a discussion section mentioned in the text?
What is the purpose of opening each paragraph of the literature review with a sentence that summarizes the paragraph's main point?
When organizing the Method section, a 'Participants' section followed by a 'Design and procedure' subsection is described as working well for methods that are:
Which part of the introduction presents the research question and hypothesis in a more formal and precise way, often using operational definitions?
What is the third step in the five-step structure for discussing a new result, according to Bem's (2003) suggestion?
According to the text, how should suggestions for future research in the Discussion section be presented?