What is the key distinction the book makes between a 'core competence' and being 'the best in the world at' something?

Correct answer: A company can have competence at something but not necessarily have the potential to be the best in the world at it.

Explanation

This question tests the understanding of a subtle but crucial point: the Hedgehog Concept demands a more rigorous standard than simply leveraging existing core competencies. It's about finding what you can be truly best at.

Other questions

Question 1

According to Isaiah Berlin's essay referenced in the book, what is the fundamental difference between the fox and the hedgehog?

Question 2

What are the three intersecting circles that form the basis of a Hedgehog Concept?

Question 3

How did Walgreens' Hedgehog Concept differ from the approach of its comparison company, Eckerd?

Question 5

What was the single economic denominator that Walgreens identified to drive its economic engine?

Question 6

How did Abbott Laboratories define its Hedgehog Concept after realizing it could not beat Merck in the big-stakes pharmaceutical game?

Question 7

What is the purpose of the 'economic denominator' question: 'If you could pick one and only one ratio—profit per x—what x would have the greatest and most sustainable impact on your economic engine?'

Question 8

What role does passion play in the Hedgehog Concept framework?

Question 9

According to the book, what was the transition date for Fannie Mae's explosion upward, which occurred one year after it clarified its Hedgehog Concept?

Question 10

What is the purpose of 'The Council' as described in the chapter?

Question 11

Hasbro was the one comparison company that understood the three circles. What was its Hedgehog Concept?

Question 12

What does the book mean by the phrase 'the curse of competence'?

Question 13

In the case of Wells Fargo, what was the Hedgehog Concept that turned it from a mediocre Citicorp wanna-be into a great company?

Question 14

What does the author say is the vital lesson from the Hasbro case?

Question 15

What was the 'simple, crystalline concept' that guided Circuit City, as mentioned in the table on page 112?

Question 16

Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of 'The Council'?

Question 17

In the personal analogy for the Hedgehog Concept, what do the three circles represent for an individual's work life?

Question 18

What happened to the good-to-great companies in the 'posthedgehog state'?

Question 19

What was the economic denominator for Nucor?

Question 20

How did Fannie Mae's people describe their passion, which formed the third circle of their Hedgehog Concept?

Question 21

What was the key insight for Gillette that allowed it to define what it could be the best in the world at?

Question 22

What is the relationship between the Hedgehog Concept and company strategy?

Question 23

On average, how many years did it take for the good-to-great companies to clarify their Hedgehog Concepts?

Question 24

What was the 'essential point' about 'Growth' that the Hedgehog Concept revealed?

Question 25

How did Philip Morris demonstrate the 'passion' circle of its Hedgehog Concept?

Question 26

What was the economic denominator for Kroger?

Question 27

What did Walgreens do when a great corner location opened up just half a block away from a profitable existing store?

Question 28

Which of the following best describes the good-to-great companies' approach to their Hedgehog Concept once it was discovered?

Question 29

What was the economic denominator for Gillette?

Question 30

What does the author conclude about the need to be in a great industry to produce great results?

Question 31

What was the key insight for Kimberly-Clark regarding what it could be best in the world at?

Question 32

Over two thirds of the comparison companies displayed what characteristic that the good-to-great companies did not?

Question 33

What does the author identify as the 'triumph of understanding over bravado'?

Question 34

What was the economic denominator insight for Pitney Bowes?

Question 35

What does the author suggest is the likely outcome if a person pursues work for which they have passion and can get paid, but can never be the best in the world at?

Question 36

What did Walgreens cluster nine of in a one-mile radius in downtown San Francisco?

Question 37

What did Great Western's CEO tell analysts in 1985 that illustrated the company's lack of a Hedgehog Concept?

Question 38

How is the process of getting a Hedgehog Concept described in the book?

Question 39

What was the economic denominator for Abbott Laboratories?

Question 40

What did the author's wife, Joanne, understand about her goal of winning the Ironman that exemplified a Hedgehog Concept?

Question 41

What was the economic denominator for Fannie Mae?

Question 42

Why did the good-to-great companies have a Hedgehog Concept while the comparison companies were more like foxes?

Question 43

What was Kimberly-Clark's economic denominator insight?

Question 44

When Eckerd acquired American Home Video Corporation in the early 1980s, it resulted in what financial outcome before the division was sold?

Question 45

What does the book argue is the consequence of having a Hedgehog Concept for an organization's view on growth?

Question 46

What was the economic denominator for Wells Fargo?

Question 47

How did Gillette's choice to build sophisticated shaving systems instead of cheap disposables relate to the 'passion' circle?

Question 48

What was the key insight regarding what Philip Morris could be best in the world at?

Question 49

What is the danger of a company having a core competence but not a Hedgehog Concept?

Question 50

How long did it take Sam Walton to grow from his first single dime store in 1945 to a chain of 38 Wal-Marts in 1970?