A key aspect of the American adversarial system is that both the state and the defendant have the opportunity to do what during trial?
Explanation
This question focuses on the core dynamic of the adversarial system—competing presentations of facts—as introduced at the beginning of the chapter.
Other questions
According to the principle of orality, what evidence is the trier of fact permitted to consider when making a decision?
Who is identified as the 'trier of fact' in a situation where the defendant waives a jury trial?
What is a major difference between the American adversarial system and the inquisitorial system as described in the chapter?
What is a 'dossier' as the term is used in the context of civil law countries?
According to the chapter, how does the principle of orality distinguish the function of a trial court from that of an appellate court?
What is the primary focus of a trial in many civil law countries, as contrasted with the American system?
Under what specific condition can a jury consider the contents of a police report, according to the principle of orality?
Which action by a jury would be a clear violation of the principle of orality?
The inquisitorial system, which contrasts with the American adversarial system, is said to be generally followed in which regions?
What is the role of the trier of fact in an inquisitorial system when presented with a dossier?
The text states that in a trial, 'the state will present evidence showing facts demonstrating that the defendant committed the crime.' What corresponding action may the defendant take?
What does the principle of orality require jurors to base their decisions on?
Which term best describes the system generally followed by the United States, as mentioned in the chapter?
In the inquisitorial system, who is responsible for creating the dossier of witness summaries?
What is the consequence of the principle of orality for an appellate court's function?
In determining guilt in a civil law country, the trier of fact is presented with what?
Who is the 'trier of fact' in a typical American jury trial?
The trial in civil law countries is described as being more about the defendant's presentation of what kind of evidence?
What is the ultimate purpose of the defendant presenting mitigation evidence in a civil law trial?
The principle of orality is identified as a major difference between which two systems?
What fundamental rule does a juror break if they research a witness online during a trial?
The function of a trial court is described as 'developing the evidence'. What is the corresponding function of appellate courts?
In the American system, what is the primary source of information for the trier of fact?
What is the key difference in how witness information is handled between the adversarial and inquisitorial systems?
If a defendant waives the right to a jury trial, what is the resulting proceeding called?
What does the text imply is the reason for the different focus of trials in civil law countries?
The principle of orality ensures that decisions are based on information that is transparent and tested through what process?
What is a key function of the American trial court that is distinguished from an appellate court?
Which of the following would NOT be considered part of the record that a trier of fact can consider under the principle of orality?
The text contrasts the adversarial system with the inquisitorial system, which is generally followed in countries with what type of legal tradition?
What is the implied role of the trial in an inquisitorial system, given its focus?
The principle of orality restricts the trier of fact to considering information received during which specific phase of the legal process?
Which statement best summarizes the process in an inquisitorial system trial as described in the chapter?
At trial, who presents the evidence demonstrating that the defendant committed the crime?
The use of a dossier in civil law countries means the trial is less about establishing guilt and more about what?
What is the term for the summaries of witness statements used in inquisitorial systems?
Which entity is NOT listed as a creator of a dossier in civil law countries?
The principle of orality is a key feature of which legal system described in the chapter?
If a judge acts as the trier of fact, what must they, like a jury, base their decision on according to the principle of orality?
What is the primary role of the state at an American criminal trial?
The chapter implies that the main risk of not adhering to the principle of orality is that a decision could be based on what?
In the context of the chapter, what does 'orality' primarily refer to?
Which statement accurately reflects the difference in trial focus between the two systems discussed?
When can the trier of fact NOT consider the contents of a police report?
What is the key limitation imposed on jurors by the principle of orality?
The chapter explains that in civil law countries, the defendant presents mitigation evidence to assist the court with what task?
How is evidence 'developed' in an American trial court?
The principle of orality distinguishes between the function of trial courts and which other courts?
Which of the following phrases from the chapter best defines the core idea of the principle of orality?